"As Governor Romney moves closer to choosing a running mate, the Daily Beast is out with a headline warning against what it calls a 'dull white guy.' It runs out the story under the headline 'Worse Than Palin?' It prompts us to reprise just why it was that we reckoned that the governor of Alaska was, as we put it at the time, 'a brilliant pick' for vice president and why we have stood by that opinion through all the ensuing contretemps. We understand completely that she is not seeking to run in the current contest. But the theme that she introduced into American politics, well, let us just say that more than any other candidate in the past decade she has dug down to what we like to call American bedrock, and that is the ground on which to run.
"By American bedrock we mean the deep constitutional principles that undergird our republic. The written constitution. Enumerated powers. Reserved powers. God-given rights. More than any other politician of her generation, Mrs. Palin has stood for what she over and over again has called 'constitutional conservatism.' It’s not 'neo-' conservatism exactly. That magnificent strain to our politics was opened up by former leftists who saw that the ideals to which the left once gave lip service were better vouchsafed by classical liberalism. It’s not 'paleo' conservativism of what was sometimes called the country-club or old-right. What Mrs. Palin has been talking about is a fealty to original principles, on taxation, monetary affairs, war, and spending.
"More to the point, in the past four years, she has taken these conservative constitutional principles to the hustings with astounding effect and shaken up not only the national debate but the Republican Party itself. All over this country, she has swung behind candidates hewing to these principles and given them a leg up onto the November ballot. We speak of Ted Cruz at Texas, Richard Mourdock at Indiana, Deb Fischer at Nebraska, and — in the last election — Nikki Haley of South Carolina and Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire. Mr. Cruz is a kind of archetype of the Palin pick, superbly educated in politics and law, fluent in the Founders and what they stood for, keenly sensitive that when the Founders gave us a written constitution it was so that we would pay attention to its plain language.
"So when the left carps about the prospect of a 'dull white guy,' let us just say we’re indifferent to race, religion, national origin, all these factors. We’re not so much interested in a ticket that 'looks like America,' in President Clinton’s phrase. We want one committed to the common-sense, constitutional principles that Mrs. Palin has been pushing. The big question is whether Governor Romney himself gets these points. We’re not of the view that what we need is a person who can read a balance sheet. We’re of the view that what we need is a person who can read the Constitution. The rest will follow. If the jury is out in respect of Mr. Romney on the constitutional fundamentals, we will learn a lot about him by whether he picks a candidate who can carry these points the way it has been done so heroically by the woman we like to call the Alert Alaskan."
[emphasis added]
Tuesday, August 07, 2012
New York Sun: Palin a VP pick to emulate
Amen to the New York Sun!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
Nice find! Though it is worth remembering that "Caribou Barbie" (as many Leftists refer to Palin) was responsible for Uncle Fester shooting all those people in Tucson, just as Michelle Bachmann was responsible for the recent shootings in Wisconsin.
It's always their fault, cause they're "haters".
I believe the rank and file of the Republican Party is increasingly libertarian. There are counties that have very libertarian central committees.
Unfortunately, some of our "heritage" leadership still feels that politics requires a sophistication it finds lacking in the Palin Movement.
See:
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/08/ann-coulter-anyone-who-donates-to-mitt-romney-ought-to-call-say-if-andrea-saul-is-not-fired-they-will-not-give-another-dime-video/
Max, these are the same type who still don't rate Reagan as one of the presidential greats (like the presidential scholars). They don't even have good 20/20 hindsight let alone being able to see the truth now. I love it when Obama sticks it to them by touting Reagan every so often. Heh.
Wow, TMI! What happened to "three cheers for Romneycare" Ann Coulter?
http://www.humanevents.com/2012/02/01/three-cheers-for-romneycare/
Apparently the aliens finally took the Beta unit back and returned the real Coulter (though she still doesn't have an ounce of sense regarding real conservative leadership like Palin's). Unfortunately, it's not just the "heritage" leadership. It seems like other than the rank and file only a small contingent of conservative "leaders" see Palin's greatness. Except for a handful of contributors, I no longer look to NR, The Weekly Standard and such for intelligent discussion of conservative principles and leadership. Sigh. Though it may be a function of my age. I've lived longer and seen more than most of their "star" writers/thinkers.
For some reason, it appears that your new posts aren't showing up on your site.
Example: I selected the following post -
Testing the Lord - The Lord’s temptation on the pinnacle of the temple is an intriguing part of the temptations Satan presents to Jesus. The temptation is described in Matthew...
But it doesn't appear.
Max, I decided not to post it here. My error in putting it up for a minute or so. Sorry for the confusion.
Just thought you had a blog hiccup; no worries.
Post a Comment