"I don't like MSM/Republicans using Ryan pick to take cheap shots at Palin. If they do, shd also then compare crowd sizes on stump."For those who want to compare, at least do a full comparison. From Ian Lazaran:
"Prediction: whomever Romney chooses will underperform Palin's convention speech and her debate performance in the polls."Both Ryan and Palin have excellences. Though Palin has shown greatness in the last four years under withering attack not only on her personally but on her family. And she has posted the most powerful endorsement/victory (2010 / 2012*) record of anyone on the current public scene. May Paul Ryan find the inner character to rise to greatness too.
*Unfortunately, the Wall Street Journal shows its incompetence in this article. Doug Brady points out that WSJ reporter Neil King Jr. didn't even do basic research to find out that Palin didn't endorse Sharron Angle in the 2010 primary. (Actually Palin's father and brother endorsed Danny Tarkanian in the primary.) Palin did endorse Angle over Harry Reid in the general election. What would be the brights standard for any Republican who endorsed Harry Reid over Angle? Or the brights standard for a reporter who thinks a Republican should have endorsed Harry Reid?